Energy efficient separation with freeze concentration
With the arrival of energy efficient compressors for water vapor and direct contact heat exchangers, where the generation of ice happens at evaporation temperatures close to the freezing point, freeze concentration can become a very efficient technology. It can also be highly relevant when converting thermal processes to electrically based technologies in our fossil free future society. In contrary to most of the thermal technologies this system would be incorporated in a flexible electric grid.
During freeze concentration the water part of the solution is lowered by crystallization with subsequent removal of the ice crystals.
This gentle and energy efficient method can compete with the best-optimized evaporation processes connected to heat pumps and MVR (mechanical vapor recompression). The removal of water takes place at much lower temperatures, which has an effect on the product quality and losses. Freeze concentration is a sublime method when product quality is the focus point and is widely used in the food industry exemplified with juice and coffee extracts. In this first part of the project the project partners will cover the possibilities related to technical and business issues. An optimized complete system will be suggested and basic tests will support the theory. In a second part we will develop a complete system based on Danish produced water vapor compressors and direct contact heat exchangers.
The project is a pre-project to investigate the marketing potential for freeze concentration mainly in Denmark. Various available products are investigated and three selected for further LCCA (Life Cycle Cost Analysis) analyses where freeze concentration is compared to evaporation and membrane technologies.
The project showed a large market potential for freeze concentration. Especially where the freeze concertation increases the product quality compared to the methods used today.
Two types of freeze concentration methods are investigated and compared to three step evaporation and membrane method. One with scraped surface heat exchangers and another where a new vacuum technology with direct evaporation is used.
The LCCA showed a great energy savings in freeze concentration compared to evaporation (87% – 97%). The economy of the freeze concentration methods compared to evaporation and membrane technology was also very promising with payback time from 0 to 5 months compare to three step evaporation methods.
Key figures
Category
Participants
Partner | Subsidy | Auto financing |
---|---|---|
DryingMate A/S | ||
Dynamic Energy Design |